How to Reconceptualize Physical Education Teacher Education Curriculum for Successful Training toward Inclusion

References

• Alberts, P. P., Murray, L. A., & Stephenson, J. E. (2010). Eight educational considerations for hybrid learning. In: F.L. Wang, J. Fong, & R. C. Kwan (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications, Information Sciences Reference (pp. 117-137). Hershey, PA. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-380-7.ch012]
• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in. The Extent and Promise of Blending Learning in the United States. Proceedings of the Sloan Consortium.
• Ammah, J. O. A., & Hodge, S. R. (2006). Secondary physical education teachers' beliefs and practices in teaching students with severe disabilities: A descriptive analysis. The High School Journal, 89(2), 40-54. [https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2005.0019]
• Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with technology today, 8(6), 9-21.
• Balci, M., & Soran, H. (2009). Students' opinions on blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 21-35. Retrieved from Ebsco Host June 2013.
• Barette, G., Holland, G., Fiorentino, L., & Kowalski, E. (1993) Physical education teacher education (PETE): Innovation through infusion and integration. The Physical Educator, 50, 69-76.
• Blinde, E. M., & McCallister, S. G. (1998). Listening to the voices of students with physical disabilities. Experiences in the physical education classroom. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(6), 64-68. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605578]
• Block, M. E., & Obrusnikova, I. (2007). Inclusion in physical education: a review of the literature from 1995-2005. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24, 103-124. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.24.2.103]
• Block, M. E., & Rizzo, T. L. (1995). Attitudes and attributes of physical educators associated with teaching individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicapped, 20(1), 80-87. [https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699502000108]
• Block, M. E., Taliaferro, A., Harris, N., & Krause, J. (2009). Using self-efficacy theory to facilitate inclusion general physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 81(3), 43-46. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598448]
• Bonk, C. J., Olson, T. M., Wisher, R. A., & Orvis, K. L. (2002). Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. The Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 97-118.
• Campbell, M. C.; Floyd, J. & Sheridan, J. B. (2002). Assessment of Student Performance And Attitudes For Courses Taught Online Versus Onsite. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 18(2), 45-51.
• Chandler, J. P. & Greene, J. L. (1995). A statewide survey of adapted physical education service delivery and teacher in-service training. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 262-274. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.12.3.262]
• Collins-Brown, E. (2011). Quality by design: Course design for optimal blending. Presentation at the 8th Annual Sloan Consortium Blended Learning Conference and Workshop, Oak Brook, IL, March 28 -29.
• Croft-Baker, N. (2001). Eight companies keep E-learning from E-Scaping. New Corporate University Review, 9(2), Retrieved from http://traininguniversity.com/tu_pi2001ma_4.php.
• Crummett, C., Mazoue, J., Anderson, R., Daughtrey, T., Love, W., MacDonald, S., Stoloff, M., Wilcox, D., and Zemliansky, P. (2010). Best Practices for Online and Hybrid Course Delivery. James Madison University. Retrieved June 1 2013, From: http://www.jmu.edu/dl/wm_library/JMU_Best_Practices.pdf.
• Dean, P. J., Stahl, M. J., Sylwester, D. L., & Peat, J. A. (2001). Effectiveness of Combined Delivery Modalities for Distance Learning and Resident Learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 247-54.
• Delialioglu, O., & Yildirim, Z. (2007). Students' perceptions on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133-146.
• DePauw, K. P. & Goc Karp, G. (1994). Integrating knowledge of disability throughout the physical education curriculum: An infusion approach. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 3-13. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.11.1.3]
• DePauw, K. P. & Goc Karp, G. (1994). Integrating knowledge of disability throughout the physical education curriculum: An infusion approach. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 3-13. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.11.1.3]
• Deperlioglu, O., & Kose, U. (2010). The effectiveness and experiences of blended learning approaches to computer programming education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education.
• Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 236-241. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.003]
• Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Retrieved October 3, 2006, from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001]
• Gautsch, S. (2011) Toward Social Learning in Blended Learning Faculty Fellows Program." Presentation at the ELI Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, (February 14, 2011). Retrieved May 12 2013: http://www.educause.edu/Resources/TowardSocialLearninginBlendedL/224484.
• Gerbic, P. (2009). Including Online Discussions within Campus-based Students' Learning Environments. In E. Stacey, & P. Gerbic, (Eds.), Effective Blended Learning Practices: Evidence-based Perspectives in ICT-facilitated Education, Information Science Reference (pp. 21-38): Hershey, NH. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-296-1.ch002]
• Gomez, J. & Igado, M. (2008). Blended learning: The key to success in a training company. International Journal Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(8).
• Goodwin, D. L., & Watkinson, E. J. (2000). Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(2), 144-160. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.17.2.144]
• Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future direction. In C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspective, local designs, (pp. 3-21), San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publising.
• Hall Jr, O. P., & Mooney, J. G. (2010). Hybrid learning systems: Meeting the challenges of graduate management education. In Hybrid Learning (pp. 35-48). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_5]
• Hardin, B. (2005). Physical education teachers' reflections on preparation for inclusion. The Physical Educator, 62(1), 44-55.
• Hartman, J. L., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (1999, August 16-18). Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: A dependent or independent variable?, Paper Summer ALN Workshops: Learning Effectiveness and Faculty Satisfaction, presented at the Sloan Urbana, IL.
• Harwell, S. H. (2003). Teacher professional development: It's not an event, it's a process. Waco, TX: CORD. Retrieved January, 2004.
• Haycock, D., & Smith, A. (2011). To assist or not to assist? A study of teachers' views of the roles of learning support assistants in the provision of inclusive physical education in England, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 835-849. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903452325]
• Haycock, D., & Smith, A. (2011). To assist or not to assist? A study of teachers' views of the roles of learning support assistants in the provision of inclusive physical education in England, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 835-849. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903452325]
• Heinze, A., & Procter, C. T. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. Education in a Changing Environment, 13-14 September 2004, University of Salford, UK. Retrieved May 15 2013 from: http://www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/papers/ah_04.rtf.
• Hensley, G. (2005). “Creating a hybrid college course: Instructional design notes and recommendations for beginners”. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(2), Retrieved January 5 2013 from: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol1_no2_hensley.htm.
• Hodge, S. R., Davis, R., Woodard, R., & Sherrill, C. (2002). Comparison of practicum types in changing preservice teachers' attitudes and perceive competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 155-171. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.19.2.155]
• Hodge, S. R., Tannehill, D., & Kluge, M. A. (2003). Exploring the meaning of practicum experiences for PETE students. Adapted Physical Education Quarterly, 20, 381-399. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.20.4.381]
• Hoffman, K. M. (2003). Online course evaluation and reporting in higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 96, 25-29. [https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.119]
• Hutzler, Y. (2003). Attitudes toward the participation of individuals with disabilities in physical activity: A review. Quest, 55(4), 347-373. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2003.10491809]
• Hutzler, Y., Zach, S., & Gafni, O. (2005). Physical Education students' attitudes and self-efficacy towards the participation of children with special needs in regular classes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(3), 309-327. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250500156038]
• Johnson S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2002). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. In T. M. Egan& S. A. Lynham (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academic for human Resource Development. Bowling Green, ID: Academy for Human Resource Development. .
• Johnson S. D., Aragon, S. A., Shalik, N,, and Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative Analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face to face learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29-49. .
• Johnson, J.Q. & Voelker-Morris, R. (2007). “Course Redesign for Hybrid Learning.” University of Oregon. Retrieved March 2015, from: http://www.nwelearn.org/conference/2007.slides/jqjohnson%20redesign.pdf.
• Kelly, R. (2008). Nine Tips for Creating a Hybrid Course. Retrieved February 2013, from: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/curriculum-development/nine-tips-for-creating-a-hybridcourse/.
• Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-634-1]
• Kim, K-J., Bonk, C. J., and Oh, E. J. (2008). The present and future state of blended learning in workplace learning settings in the United States. Performance Improvement, 47(8), 5-16. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20018]
• Kowalski, E. M. (1995). The infusion approach to teacher development, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 4, 49-53. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1995.10608141]
• Kowalski, E. M., & Rizzo, T. L. (1996). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ atttiudes toward individuals with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 180-196. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.13.2.180]
• Kwon, E. & Block, M. E. (2013). Status of introductory APE course and infusion in PETE program. Annual cconference of the National Consortium for Physical Education for Individuals with Disabilities, Reston, VA.
• LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. (1998). Inclusion practices of effective elementary specialists. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64-81. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.15.1.64]
• Laster, S., Otte, G., Picciano, A. G., & Sorg, S. (2005). Redefining blended learning. Presentation at the 2005 Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning, Chicago, IL. .
• Lepore, M., & Kowalski, E. (1992). Infusion: A new look at an old idea. Paper presentation at the North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity (NAFAPA) conference. Montreal, Canada.
• Lepore, M., Gayle, G. W., & Stevens, S. F. (1998). Adapted Aquatics Programming: A professional guide. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Linert, C., Sherrill, C., & Myers, B. (2001). Physical educators' concerns about integrating children with disabilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 1-17. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.18.1.1]
• Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1(18). Retrieved June 2013, from: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0313.pdf.
• Meegan, S. & MacPhail, A. (2006). Irish physical educators' attitude toward teaching students with special educational needs. European Physical Education Review, 12(1), 75-97. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X06060213]
• Morgan, K. R. (2002). Blended learning: A strategic action plan for a new campus. Seminole, FL: University of Central Florida.
• National Center for Education Statistics (2016). The condition of Education 2016. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 2017: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016144.pdf.
• Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended course? Insights from faculty members, Computer & Education, 56(3), 689-699. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.011]
• Orton-Johnson, K. (2009). “I’ve stuck to the path I’m afraid”: exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837-847. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00860.x]
• Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-33.
• PEW. (2003). Program in course redesign. Center for Academic Transformation. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. Retrieved August 2016, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant.html.
• Piletic, C. K. & Davis, R. (2010). A profile of the introduction to adapted physical education course within undergraduate physical education teacher education program. Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 5(2), 26-32.
• Poirier, S. (2010). A hybrid course design: the best of both educational worlds. Techniques (ACTE), 85(6): 28-31.
• Power, A. L. (2004). Teacher preparation for environmental education: Faculty perspectives on the infusion of environmental education into preservice methods courses. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(3), 3-11.
• Reynolds, T. & Greiner, C. (2005). Integrated field experiences in online teacher education: A natural blend? In C.J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
• Rizzo, T. L., & Kirkland, D. (1995). Teaching students with mild disabilities: What affects attitudes of future physical educators?. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 205-216. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.12.3.205]
• Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in Higher Education. In C. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 155-168). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
• Rossett, A., Douglis, F., and Frazee, R.V. (2003). Strategies for building blended learning. ASTD. Retrieved March 2013 from: http://www.astd.org/C/2003/703_ossett.htm.
• Shank, P., & Sitze, A. (2004). Making sense of online learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
• Shibley, I. (2009). Blended Course Design. Magna Publication. Retrieved May 2 2013 from: http://www.magnapubs.com/talog/ended-learning-course-design-whitepaper/.
• Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational technology, 43(6), 51-54.
• Smelser, L. M. (2002). Making Connections in Our Classrooms: Online and Off. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, IL.
• Smith, S. J., & Meyen, E. L. (2003). Applications of online instruction: An overview for teachers, students with mild disabilities, and their parents. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(6), 1-15.
• Smith, S. B., Smith, S. J., & Boone, R. (2012). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment, Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37-46. [https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500204]
• Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. San Francisco, CA: Innosight Institute. Retrieved March 2 2013 from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-contentuploads/2012/05/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning2.pdf.
• Sullivan, P. (2002). “It's easier to be yourself when you are invisible”: Female college students discuss their online classroom experiences. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 129-143. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021109410893]
• Tan, L., Wang, M., and Xiao, J. (2010). Best practices in teaching online or hybrid courses: A synthesis of principles. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6248: 117-12. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_12]
• Troha, F. J. (2002). “Bulletproof Instructional Design: A Model for Blended Learning.” USDLA Journal, 16(5). Retrieved April 2 2013 from: http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAY02_Issue/article03.html.
• Twigg, C. A. (2003). Models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 28-38.
• U.S. Department of Education. (2001). The Condition of Education 2001 .Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
• U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO U.S. government Accountability Office) (2010), entitled 'Students With Disabilities: More Information and Guidance Could Improve Opportunities in Physical Education and Athletics'. Report number GAO-10-519.
• Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258. [https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x]
• Woltering, V., Herrler, A., Spitzer, K., & Spreckelsen, C. (2009). Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(5), 725-738. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6]
• Yeh, Y. C., Huang, L., & Yeh, Y. (2011). Knowledge management in blended learning: Effects on professional development in creativity instruction, Computer & Education, 56(1), 146-156. York: Plenum Press. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.011]
• Yukawa, J. (2010). Communities of Practice for Blended Learning: Toward an Integrated Model for LISEducation. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51(2), 54-75.