Research in Dance and Physical Activity

Current Issue

Research in Dance and Physical Activity - Vol. 6 , No. 3

[ Article ]
Research in Dance and Physical Activity - Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 1-16
ISSN: 2951-4770 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2022
Received 11 Oct 2022 Revised 13 Dec 2022 Accepted 22 Dec 2022

Sustainable Footwear in Outdoor Sportswear Industries: An Effect of Recycled Fabric Configuration on a Thermal Sensation Model in the Foot
Changhyun Nam1 ; Jie Yang2 ; Woong Kwon3, *
1Florida State University, USA, Teaching Faculty
2Xi’an University of Science and Technology, China, Associate Professor
3Jeju National University, Republic of Korea, Assistant Professor

Correspondence to : *Email address:

Funding Information ▼


The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of recycled fabrics (i.e., denim and hemp) on a thermal sensation model in the foot from the perspectives of fabric thermal properties and thermal sensation. The thermal and evaporative resistance of a two-layered material configuration, including recycled denim fabric and hemp fabric (recycled DH fabric), were compared with commercial calf-skin and pig-skin leathers (CP leather). For potential outdoor shoes, the thermal sensation model in the foot was proposed to predict thermal sensation with different fabrics in real time based on environmental conditions and fabric properties. The results showed that there were no significant differences between thermal insulation and evaporative resistance among the five different thicknesses of recycled DH fabrics. The thermal sensation model in the foot in the fabrics ranged from -0.7 (slightly cool) to 0.5 (slightly warm) in the case studied (25ºC, 45% relative humidity, and 0.5 m/s of air velocity). A similar thermal sensation among the recycled DH fabrics was observed with a maximum difference at the thermal sensation of 0.04. Therefore, the thermal sensation model in the foot of wearers wearing recycled DH fabrics and sustainable denim shoes is practically comparable to the thermal sensation of commercial shoes. This study can be used to provide fundamental knowledge regarding recycled material testing for developing outdoor sustainable products including footwear and clothing in sportswear industries.

Keywords: sportswear, footwear, recycled fabrics, sustainability, thermal sensation model


This research was supported by the 2022 scientific promotion program funded by Jeju National University.

1. American Society for Testing and Materials (2008). ASTM D 737 standard test method for air permeability of textile fabrics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (2014). ASTM F1868 standard test method for thermal and evaporative resistance of clothing materials using a sweating hot plate. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 (2020): Thermal environmental conditions from human occupancy. Atlanta, CA: American National Standards Institute.
4. Bedek, G., Salaün, F., Martinkovska, Z., Devaux, E., & Dupont, D. (2011). Evaluation of thermal and moisture management properties on knitted fabrics and comparison with a physiological model in warm conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 42(6), 792-800.
5. Bergquist, K. & Abeysekera, J. (1994). Ergonomic aspects of safety shoes worn in a cold climate. Proceedings from the Third Pan-Pacific Conference on Occupational Ergonomics, Seoul, South Korea: PPCOE, pp. 590-594.
6. Cao, H., Wool, R. P., Bonanno, P., Dan, Q., Kramer, J., & Lipschitz, S. (2014). Development and evaluation of apparel and footwear made from renewable bio-based materials. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 7(1), 21-30.
7. Cheng, Y., Niu, J., & Gao, N. (2012). Thermal comfort models: A review and numerical investigation. Building and Environment, 47, 13-22.
8. Davoodi, F., Hassanzadeh, H., Zolfaghari, S. A., Havenith, G., & Maerefat, M. A. (2018). new individualized thermoregulatory bio-heat model for evaluating the effects of personal characteristics on human body thermal response. Building and Environment, 136, 62-76.
9. Gam, J. H., Cao, H., Farr, C., & Heine, L. (2009). C2CAD: A sustainable apparel design and production model. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 21(4), 166-179.
10. Huang J. (2006). Thermal parameters for assessing thermal properties of clothing. Journal of Thermal Biology, 31(6), 461-466.
11. Irzmańska, E., Brochocka, A., & Majchrzycka, K. (2012). Textile composite materials with bioactive melt-blown nonwovens for protective footwear. Fibers & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 20(6A (95)), 119-125.
12. Ji, W., Zhu, Y., & Cao, B. (2020). Establish predicted thermal sensation (PTS) model using the ASHRAE global thermal comfort database. Energy and Buildings, 211, 109780.
13. Kruger, E. L., & Drach, P. (2017). Identifying potential effects from anthropometric variables on outdoor thermal comfort. Building and Environment, 117, 230-237.
14. Kuklane K. (2009). Protection of feet in cold exposure. Industrial Health, 47(3), 242-253.
15. Kuklane, K., Holmer I., & Giesbrecht, G. (1999). Change of footwear insulation at sweating rates. Applied Human Science Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 18(5), 161-168.
16. Li, R., Yang, J., Xiang, C., & Song, G. (2018). Assessment of thermal comfort of nanosilver-treated functional sportswear fabrics using a dynamic thermal model with human/clothing/environmental factors. Textile Research Journal, 88(4), 413-425.
17. Li, Y. (2001). The science of clothing comfort. Textile Progress, 31(1-2), 1-135.
18. Liu, H., Wu, Y., Lei, D., & Li, B. (2018). Gender differences in physiological and psychological responses to the thermal environment with varying clothing ensembles. Building and Environment, 141, 45-54.
19. McQuerry, M., DenHartog, E., & Barker, R. (2017). Evaluating turnout composite layering strategies for reducing thermal burden in structural firefighter protective clothing systems. Textile Research Journal, 87(10), 1217-1225.
20. Nam, C., & Lee, Y A. (2018). Multilayered cellulosic material as a leather alternative in the footwear industry. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 37(1), 1-15.
21. Nam, C., Dong, H., & Lee, Y. A. (2017). Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention of green sportswear. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1), 1-7.
22. Lin, Z., & Deng, S. (2008). A study on the thermal comfort in sleeping environments in the subtropics—developing a thermal comfort model for sleeping environments. Building and environment, 43(1), 70-81.
23. Oğulata, R. T. (2007). The effect of thermal insulation of clothing on human thermal comfort. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 15(2), 61.
24. Recyclebank (2018). How can I recycle Denim? Retrieved from
25. Roberts-Islam B (2018). HNST Recycles denim waste into new, sustainable jeans. Retrieved from
26. Sabir, E. C. & Kadem, F. D. (2016). Comfort and performance properties of raised and laminated denim fabrics. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 5(119), 88-94.
27. Savage, R. J., Lord, C., Larsen, B. L., Knight, T. L., Langridge, P. D., & Aisbett, B. (2014). Firefighter feedback during active cooling: A useful tool for heat stress management? Journal of Thermal Biology, 46, 65-71.
28. Schacher, L., Adolphe, D. C., & Drean, J. Y. (2000). Comparison between thermal insulation and thermal properties of classical and microfibres polyester fabrics. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 12(2), 84-95.
29. Statista (2022). Sports & Outdoor. Retrieved from
30. Stankovic, S. B. & Bizjak, M. (2014). Effect of yarn folding on comfort properties of hemp knitted fabrics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 32(3), 202-214.
31. Stolwijk, J. A. A. (1971). Mathematical model of physiological temperature regulation in man. Nasa Contractor Report, 1-77.
32. Tanabe, S. I., Kobayashi, K., Nakano, J., Ozeki, Y., & Konishi, M. (2002). Evaluation of thermal comfort using combined multi-node thermoregulation (65MN) and radiation models and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Energy and Buildings, 34(6): 637-646.
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2019). Facts and figures about materials, waste, and recycling. Retrieved from
34. Wang, F., Lai, D., Shi, W., & Fu, M. (2017). Effects of fabric thickness and material on apparent ‘wet’ conductive thermal resistance of knitted fabric ‘skin’ on sweating manikins. Journal of Thermal Biology, 70, 69-76.
35. Yang, J., Weng, W. G., & Zhang, B. T., (2014). Experimental and numerical study of physiological responses in hot environments. Journal of Thermal Biology, 45, 54-61.
36. Yoo, S. & Barker, R. L. (2005). Comfort properties of heat-resistant protective workwear in varying conditions of physical activity and environment. Part I: Thermophysical and sensorial properties of fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 75(7), 523-530.
37. Zhang, H., Arens, E., Huizenga, C., & Han, T., (2010a). Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part II: Local comfort of individual body parts. Journal Building and Environment, 45(2), 389-398.
38. Zhang, H., Arens, E., Huizenga, C., & Han, T. (2010b). Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part III: Whole-body sensation and comfort. Building and Environment, 45(2), 399-410.
39. Zhang, H., Huizenga, C., Arens, E., & Yu, T. (2001). Considering individual physiological differences in a human thermal model. Journal of Thermal Biology, 26(4-5), 401-408.